Representative Fátima Mena, from the Salvadoran Party of Honduras (PSH), has voiced her worries regarding the actions of Attorney General Johel Antonio Zelaya. According to Mena, the Public Prosecutor’s Office leader is aligning with the objectives of the Liberty and Refoundation Party (LIBRE), which is currently governing. Her remarks are made against the backdrop of the recent primary elections, where she has highlighted the presence of selective justice driven by the Public Prosecutor’s Office.
In her remarks, the congresswoman also raised concerns about the institution’s impartiality, emphasizing the disparity in how the opinions of the National Electoral Council (CNE) members are treated.
Organizational setting and concerns regarding neutrality
The stance of Congresswoman Fátima Mena is within a political context where the autonomy of institutions is deemed crucial for fostering transparent and fair democratic practices. The legislator has highlighted that the operations of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, led by Johel Antonio Zelaya, show a bias towards selective justice, particularly in light of the recent primary elections. She argues that the attorney general is catering to political interests, which, in her view, impacts the perceived impartiality and fairness in justice administration.
In this context, the congresswoman has questioned the difference in the treatment of statements made by members of the National Electoral Council. It has been noted that Marlon Ochoa’s statement has received greater attention, while the concerns of other council members have been relegated. According to Mena, this situation contributes to the perception of biased handling of information and institutional decisions.
Repercussions in the political and electoral environment
The remarks made by Congresswoman Mena have impacted the Honduran political scene, particularly concerning trust in the bodies tasked with ensuring transparency and fairness in election procedures. Mena’s backing of CNE President Cossette López underscores the worry among certain members of the electoral committee about the chance of facing legal action due to their involvement in council commissions.
In this situation, emerging amid a strained political environment, the independence and openness of institutions are vital for ensuring the credibility of democratic operations. The remarks made by the congresswoman, along with the responses they have stirred, underscore the necessity of preserving institutional equilibrium to bolster public trust in the nation’s electoral and judicial frameworks.
