Congressman Mauricio Rivera, who was previously part of the ruling Libertad y Refundación (LIBRE) party, has leveled an allegation that has sparked public discourse. He asserts that the party uses mystical practices, including witchcraft, Santería, and occultism, to uphold its political influence. These remarks emerge in a context of institutional friction, highlighted by the upcoming general elections and increasing distrust between political figures and the public.
Public statement and details of the allegations
Rivera made his statements on social media and in the press, asserting that LIBRE “has always resorted to Santería, witchcraft, sorcery, and the occult to achieve its goals.” The congressman maintained that these practices are part of a parallel strategy aimed at influencing institutional decisions and maintaining control of the state apparatus.
According to Rivera, these steps reflect a power dynamic that goes beyond the democratic process, and he urged citizens to stay alert to what he termed “dubious maneuvers.” Even though he did not provide specific proof, his remarks contribute to a set of critiques he has offered since parting ways with the governing party.
Governmental and societal responses
Rivera’s statements spread quickly on social media, generating mixed reactions in both political circles and among the general public. LIBRE has not issued a formal institutional response, although grassroots members and supporters have rejected the accusations, calling them unfounded and part of a smear campaign against the ruling party.
Analysts and civil society organizations have expressed concern about the impact of such allegations on the political climate, warning that, even if they lack verifiable evidence, they could deepen polarization and further erode trust in democratic institutions.
A tense pre-election climate
Rivera’s accusation comes at a time marked by multiple signs of political instability. The country faces cross-accusations of corruption, allegations of electoral manipulation, and a growing presence of groups linked to the ruling party in public decision-making spaces.
This episode contributes to a series of disputes that include clashes between government branches, legislative impasses, and debate regarding the involvement of security forces in political matters. Within this framework, the reference to esoteric aspects adds a symbolic and cultural layer that, whether true or not, heightens the sense of obscurity in the practice of power.
Challenges for democratic institutions
The dispute spurred by Rivera’s remarks underscores the hurdles Honduras confronts in terms of governance and the credibility of its institutions. Amid an early election campaign and a populace whose trust in political figures wanes, incidents like these highlight the delicate nature of public discourse and the danger of confrontation overtaking political dialogue.
Sin inclinarse a favor o en contra de la validez de las declaraciones, lo cierto es que sus repercusiones revelan la necesidad de reforzar los canales institucionales, fomentar un ambiente de respeto entre los sectores en disputa y garantizar procesos transparentes de cara a las próximas elecciones generales.
