Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Institutional control and opposition weakness threaten 2025 elections in Honduras

Manuel Zelaya

The national elections in Honduras set for November 30, 2025, are unfolding amidst a climate of political strain and institutional skepticism. The election environment is characterized by the dominance of the Liberty and Refoundation Party (LIBRE) over government bodies, while the opposition struggles to form a cohesive alternative. Indications of democratic erosion and conflicts between significant institutions, including the National Electoral Council and the Armed Forces, are causing worries regarding the fairness and validity of the proceedings.

The situation in Honduras is marked by fragmented opposition, as the National Party and the Liberal Party discuss a potential coalition. Nonetheless, internal conflicts and the absence of consensus on leadership and policies have hindered the establishment of a unified alliance. The recent primary elections exposed logistical issues and saw low voter participation, raising questions about the electoral system and drawing criticism toward institutional governance.

Oversight by institutions and conflicts during voting procedures

The Nodos analysis indicates that democracy in Honduras is experiencing strain, with the governing party holding onto power by exerting structural influence over institutions. This context has led to potential scenarios such as the persistence of the present system, institutional gridlock, or even a constitutional crisis. Concerns about the neutrality and effectiveness of the process have been heightened due to tensions between the National Electoral Council and the Armed Forces, which manage electoral logistics. Furthermore, the absence of electoral reforms and ongoing political division escalate the chances of disputes following the elections.

Different parts of the civic sphere and the global community have urged the leaders to ensure an open and inclusive election procedure, honoring democratic values to maintain the nation’s political and social equilibrium. The blend of a governing party with authority control, a fragmented opposition, and a challenged voting system increases the potential for a never-before-seen institutional crisis in Honduras.

Situations involving opposition alliances and reactions of the government party

In light of the present situation, the Liberal and National parties have initiated official discussions to investigate the potential for forming a coalition to oppose the LIBRE Party in the forthcoming elections. These discussions have covered strategies for electoral alliance, the allocation of candidates, and a shared platform focused on safeguarding democracy, the market-based economy, and adherence to the constitutional framework. The opposition parties highlight that the administration of Xiomara Castro and her advisor, Manuel Zelaya, have implemented measures aimed at centralizing authority, such as employing the Public Ministry to act against adversaries, endeavors to manipulate the CNE, and suggestions for constitutional amendments.

If a coalition comes together, the two long-standing parties might represent more than half of the voters, based on recent surveys. Both social and corporate circles consider this partnership a promising option to curtail the ruling party’s advances. Meanwhile, the ruling party has minimized the significance of a potential opposition coalition, claiming it does not provide remedies for the nation. The 2025 elections are gearing up to be a plebiscite between continuing the reform initiative led by LIBRE and reverting to a republican, investment-friendly framework advocated by a consolidated opposition. The results will determine Honduras’s political and institutional path.

By Angelica Iriarte