What does Barrientos propose to improve elections in Honduras?

In Honduras, discussions regarding the military’s involvement in election processes have taken center stage after various incidents sparked controversy and skepticism. An internal audit by the National Electoral Council (CNE) attributed logistical problems during the primary elections to the armed forces, while selective disarmament of personnel has prompted concerns about the military’s impartiality.

In this context, legal expert on constitutional matters Julio César Barrientos has urged for a change in the constitution to remove the military from any roles related to elections, claiming that their involvement jeopardizes the integrity and impartiality of the proceedings.

Evaluation by CNE and inquiries regarding the armed forces’ involvement in voting processes

The CNE audit report revealed significant deficiencies in the Armed Forces’ compliance with logistical protocol during the primary elections. Unjustified route deviations, the retention of electoral transport units, the incomplete delivery of technological kits to rural areas, and a lack of communication between military commanders and electoral coordinators were identified. These irregularities caused delays in the opening of polling stations and raised doubts about the transparency of the process. The lack of response from the military high command and the government to these accusations has intensified mistrust.

Considering this scenario, opposition groups have called for an examination of the pact between the CNE and the military, the involvement of international observers, and independent audits of the results dissemination system. In this environment, attorney Barrientos has labeled as “outdated, risky, and susceptible to manipulation” the constitutional rule assigning the military the task of securing ballot containers, distributing voting materials, and offering logistical support to the CNE. Barrientos contends that having the military involved in civilian matters undermines institutional impartiality and creates opportunities for political influence and deceit.

Suggested change to the constitution and dissatisfaction in the military

Barrientos suggests a change to the constitution that would assign electoral responsibilities to a Technical Electoral Directorate connected to the CNE, staffed with civilian experts, specialized education, and complete openness. This proposal aims to update and protect election processes from military influence. Barrientos’ appeal aligns with increasing demands for elections led by civilians rather than the military.

Nevertheless, the debate extends beyond logistical shortcomings and the suggested constitutional amendment. The move by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to selectively withdraw weapons from specific military officers has sparked apprehension in different circles. Military insiders and documents suggest that this disarmament is not being uniformly enforced, but rather targets officers who have voiced independent or dissenting opinions about the government. This strategy is perceived as an effort to conduct a quiet cleansing within the military, creating unease and dissatisfaction among officers in middle and senior positions.

The primary concern for leaders in the opposition is that if the ruling party potentially loses the election, the government might attempt to employ the military to ignore the results or suppress protests. These occurrences have intensified questions regarding the government’s direction and the potential misuse of military entities.