Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Plus Ultra Airline Executives Julio Miguel Martínez Sola and Roberto Roselli Miele Taken Into Custody

https://fotografias.larazon.es/clipping/cmsimages01/2025/02/21/2B03E7E6-241B-416F-B88D-21837BAA353C/98.jpg

The chairman of Plus Ultra Líneas Aéreas, Julio Miguel Martínez Sola, along with the company’s chief executive officer (CEO), Roberto Roselli Miele, were taken into custody on Thursday during an operation spearheaded by the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office and executed by the National Police’s UDEF unit. The operation involved a search of the airline’s headquarters, where documents and digital storage devices were confiscated, as reported by legal sources referenced by multiple media outlets.

The inquiry, currently under secrecy of proceedings (sealed), is overseen by Madrid’s Court of Investigation No. 15 and centers on suspected money laundering. Prosecutors contend that public funds from the 2021 bailout provided to the airline—€53 million in total—might have been misappropriated.

After appearing before the court, released under precautionary measures

After being detained, the executives were brought this Saturday to the courts in Madrid, where they appeared before the duty court (Investigating Court No. 13). The judge mandated their release with precautionary measures: surrendering their passports, a prohibition on leaving Spain, and regular court check-ins. Based on the published information, the suspects exercised their right to remain silent, a typical choice in proceedings that have been declared confidential.

Which offences are being investigated, and why the public bailout is involved

According to Cadena SER, the individuals in custody are tentatively accused of crimes like money laundering, misappropriation, and criminal organization. However, the ultimate legal categorization will hinge on how the investigation unfolds and what becomes evident once the confidentiality order is revoked.

The core of the case—always on the basis of preliminary indications and according to the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s complaint—would be the alleged channelling of illicit funds originating in Venezuela through structures in Europe, with a possible temporal link to fund movements following the bailout. In the Prosecutor’s narrative, possible sources of illicit funds include payments connected to Venezuelan public programs (such as CLAP) and transactions related to gold.

Cadena SER introduces a significant procedural detail: Anti-Corruption prosecutors are said to have initially tried to bring the case to the National Court (Audiencia Nacional), which refused jurisdiction, leading the complaint to ultimately land in Investigating Court No. 15. Additionally, it is mentioned that an earlier investigation into the bailout was dismissed, and this fresh line of inquiry has been initiated as a separate case file, a move that the defense teams are already contesting.

Who are Julio Miguel Martínez Sola and Roberto Roselli Miele?

In public corporate registry records, the name Julio Miguel Martínez Sola appears linked to Plus Ultra Líneas Aéreas, S.A. For his part, Roberto Roselli Miele appears under his full name in the airline’s corporate documentation, such as the 2024 notice convening the General Shareholders’ Meeting, which explicitly references the “Appointment of the Board Member, Mr. Roberto Roselli Miele.”

With the suspects released under precautionary measures, the case enters a more technical phase: analysis of the seized material, tracing transactions and the flow of funds, and potentially further summonses or an expansion of charges if evidence is consolidated. As long as the proceedings remain sealed, evidentiary details will largely be limited to what emerges from judicial sources and to the court decisions that become public.

By Angelica Iriarte